My fascination with Jonathan Franzen has been called pathological and unhealthy, perhaps due to my tendency to praise the man and announce my disgust for him in the same paragraph. With the release of his second collection of essays, I know my Franzen-fever is acting up again because I am both thoroughly enjoying and feeling queasy about The Discomfort Zone: A Personal History (Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2006), just in at the Merc.

Franzen is a mystery wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a publicity stunt, or that’s what ditching out of being selected as an Oprah Book Club author, as he did for his novel The Corrections looked like to me. And then there’s the contradiction between the author of an essay, in How to Be Alone (Picador, 2003) lamenting the loss to an information age of his privacy–this from a writer with a demostrated, unabashed willingness to admit anything, and I mean anything about himself, for your reading enjoyment. Whatever the case, Franzen wants to be liked and he’s willing to write well and colorfully for your attention.

I won’t even bore you with the sordid story of the infamous essay “Perchance to Dream” (Harper’s. 292, no. 1751, (1996)) in which Franzen whined about the reception of his previous novel, lamented the decline of The American Novel, and bragged about his plan to rectify the situation with his next book. Whether The Corrections lives up to Franzen’s braggadocio, The Discomfort Zone firmly establishes his place as a loveable, intellectual, fun-to-read nitwit.

-Ed Scripsi

Published in: on September 13, 2006 at 11:04 am  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. It was irresponsible of me not to include a brief description of The Discomfort Zone: A Personal History. True to its title, a memoir: think The Wonder Years on steroids with a serious geek factor. Pithy character studies, loving memorials of past loves and pedagogues, breakneck digressions ranging from the historical to the culturally critical ala David Foster Wallace, except annoying in a way Wallace isn’t, but in more of a nebbishly-funny-but-annoying Woody Allen sort of a way.  -e.s.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: